Dear Mason,

I love you grandson. For the record, we will celebrate your third birthday on May 16, 2004. We celebrated my sixty seventh on February 15, 2004. I must confess that not all of the contents of this letter are in my words. I am just adopting them. My objective is to be persuasive and I need all the help I can get.  

Many people believe that a powerful, elite group has designs to seize control of the world. Of course this idea has been around for centuries and often the bad guy in movies, cartoon and popular American culture also have the same idea. Whether or not the conspiracy is true, we must recognize that many want to see the strongest nation on earth be brought down. You cannot see the wind, but you can see the effect. Trees just don't wave themselves. The wind may be blowing with purpose but rather than debate who and what the wind is as it relates to the subversion of America, we can all observe that the trees in American society and government are being whipped around so vigorously that its roots may not hold. 

The surest way to destroy a tree is to remove its roots from the ground.  The surest way to destroy America is to have her relinquish her sovereignty, remove the U.S. constitution as the supreme law of the land and subject her to the rule of another government. This is exactly the agenda being advocated in the creation of a “one-world” government in a global union.

This goal can be exclaimed to be in the best interest of humanity by eliminating conflicts among nations and offering a way to ensure peace. These lofty ideals provide a platform by which people and groups throughout the world publicly endorse the movement towards a one-world government. Individuals with personal beliefs of pragmatism along with the power elite with ulterior self interest have combined to accelerate an all out assault to dismantle the sovereignty of the United States of America and have begun to shout their message from all corners of the globe.

The form of government secured by the Declaration of Independence, the American Revolution, and the Constitution is unique in history and reflects the strongly held beliefs of the American Revolutionaries. At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 18, 1787, a Mrs. Powel anxiously awaited the results, and as Benjamin Franklin emerged from the long task now finished, asked him directly: "Well Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic if you can keep it" responded Franklin.

We have, in the last 100 years, gone from the accepted and cherished notion of a sovereign nation to one of a globalist, New World Order. As we once had three separate branches of our government, the United Nations proudly uses its three branches, the World Bank, the IMF, and the World Trade Organization to work their will in this new era of globalism. Because the US is by far the strongest military industrial power, it can dictate the terms of these international institutions, protecting what we see as our various interests such as oil, along with satisfying our military industrial complex. Our presidents now fight wars, not only without explicit congressional approval, but also in the name of the United Nations with our troops now serving under foreign commanders. Our presidents have assured us that UN authorization is all that's needed to send our troops into battle.

The Charter for Global Democracy. In September 2000 the United Nations convened a special Millennium Assembly as a global summit on the future of the world. This event crowned a decade of preparation to launch the new millennium on a new system of global governance.

The blueprint was published by the Commission on Global Governance in 1995. Now, a Charter to achieve global governance has been developed for presentation at the Millennium Assembly September 2000. It was published publicly on UN day, October 24th, 1999. It is called The Charter for Global Democracy.

It has already been signed by influential leaders in 56 nations and has the support of civil society non-government organizations around the world. The document is, in reality, a Charter for the abolition of individual freedom.

Principle # 1: calls for the consolidation of all international agencies under the direct authority of the United Nations.

Principle # 2: calls for regulation by the UN of all transnational corporations and financial institutions, requiring an "international code of conduct" concerning the environment and labor standards.

Principle # 3: demands an independent source of revenue for the UN, such as the "Tobin tax" and taxes on aircraft and shipping fuels, and licensing the use of the global commons. The "global commons" are defined to be "outer space, the atmosphere, non-territorial seas, and the related environment that supports human life."

Principle # 4: eliminates the veto power and permanent member status on the Security Council.

Principle # 5: authorizes a standing UN army.

Principle # 6: requires UN registration of all arms and the reduction of all national armies "as part of a multilateral global security system" under the authority of the United Nations.

Principle # 7: requires individual and national compliance with all UN "Human Rights" treaties and declarations.

Principle # 8: activates the International Criminal Court, make the International Court of Justice compulsory for all nations, and give individuals the right to petition the courts to remedy social injustice.

Principle # 9: calls for a new institution to establish economic and environmental security by insuring "sustainable development."

Principle # 10: calls for the establishment of an International Environmental Court.

Principle # 11: calls for a declaration that climate change is an essential global security interest that requires the creation of a "high-level action team" to allocate carbon emission based on equal per-capita rights.

Principle # 12: calls for the cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions, and for "equitable sharing of global resources," as allocated by the United Nations.

There is a world of difference between the US Constitution and the UN document planned to replace it. Conspiracy or not, it is undeniable to those capable of critical thinking, that brain washing techniques are being used to change opinions regarding race, homosexuality and gun control, to name a few. Whether we agree or disagree with their version of those particular issues it is the process we all must fear and fight.

We are all in a hypnotic state of varying degrees. We have been conditioned to react with scorn and disbelief to any suggestion of this message. At best we tolerate people we care about although we don't want to be bothered by this nonsense. At worst we react with rage, spewing profanities, hatred and personal insults while disregarding evidence from our own eyes and ears. Only intelligent people can be hypnotized so I suppose it follows that those most hypnotized must be the most intelligent.

 Praise the Lord Mason! The news is not all bad. Rejoice, and let your chest swell with pride! There are definite signs of progress. The spark has not been extinguished and a tiny but growing flame still flickers in the near pitch black in which we find ourselves. Some wildfires just take time to get started.

I see this issue in terms of chickens and eagles. There is only one question on my test to determine which category we fall in.  Do you favor submerging the US into a world government, yes or no? Those who answer no should add their flame to the fire and go to work on those who answer yes.

The Revolution and subsequent Constitution settled the question as to which authority should rule man's action: the individual or the state. The authors of the Constitution clearly understood that man has free will to make personal choices and be responsible for the consequences of his own actions. Man, they knew, was not to be simply a cog in a wheel, or a single cell of an organism, or a branch of a tree, but an individual with a free will and responsibility for his eternal soul as well as his life on earth. If God could permit spiritual freedom, government certainly ought to permit the political freedom that allows one to pursue life's dreams and assume one's responsibilities. If man can achieve spiritual redemption through grace, which allows him to use the released spiritual energy to pursue man's highest and noblest goals, so should man's mind, body, and property be freed from the burdens of unchecked government authority. The Founders were confident that this would release the creative human energy required to produce the goods and services that would improve the living standards of all mankind.

I spent a week recently  with you and your beautiful, 16 year old, identical twin half sisters, Alex and Ariana. It was a very enjoyable week but also distressing for me. Your sisters are not just empty headed teenagers. They are honor students at an exclusive private school. They were recently shown the Michael Moore movie Bowling for Columbine by their school. One night your Dad, your sisters and myself watched it together and talked about it afterward.

In my view Bowling for Columbine is a despicable piece of racist trash. Your sister's on the other hand felt it to be a reasonable position on most of the issues it addressed.   

We somehow need to help them understand that their positions have been formed with insufficient information. Why is the other side, meaning those who want to put US under a world government, afraid to present opposing views? Could it be they do not believe they can win with honest debate? They try to black out opposition views as much as possible and attack the messenger when that fails. If they cannot refute the message, kill the messenger.

Unbelievable changes have occurred in the 20th Century. We went from the horse and buggy age to the space age. Computer technology and the Internet have dramatically changed the way we live. All kinds of information and opinions on any subject are now available by clicking a few buttons. Technology offers an opportunity for everyone who seeks the truth to find it, yet at the same time, it enhances the ability of government to monitor our every physical, communicative, and financial move. And let there be no doubt, for the true believers in big government, they see this technology as a great advantage for their cause.

The role of the US government in public education has changed dramatically over the past 100 years. Most of the major changes have occurred in the second half of this century. In the 19th century, the closest the federal government got to public education was the Land Grant College program. In the last 40 years, the federal government has essentially taken charge of the entire system. It is involved in education at every level through loans, grants, court directives, regulations, and curriculum manipulation.

Controlled curricula have downplayed the importance of our constitutional heritage while indoctrinating our children, even in kindergarten, with environmental mythology, internationalism, and sexual liberation. Neighborhood schools in the early part of the 20th Century did not experience this kind of propaganda.

Freedom of speech is still cherished in America, but the political correctness movement has seriously undermined dissent on our university campuses. A conservative or libertarian black intellectual is clearly not treated with the same respect afforded an authoritarian black spokesman. We now hear of individuals being sent to psychiatrists when personal and social views are rude or out of the ordinary. It was commonplace in the Soviet system to incarcerate political dissenters in "mental" institutions. Those who received a Soviet government designation of "socially undesirable elements" were stripped of their rights. Will this be the way we treat political dissent in the future? We hear of people losing their jobs because of "socially undesirable" thoughts or for telling off-color jokes. Today sensitivity courses are routinely required in America to mold social thinking for the simplest of infractions. The thought-police are all around us. It's a bad sign.

Any academic discussion questioning the wisdom of our policies surrounding World War II is met with shrill accusations of anti-Semitism and Nazi lover. No one is even permitted without derision by the media, the university intellectuals, and the politicians to ask why the United States allied itself with the murdering Soviets and then turned over Eastern Europe to them while ushering in a 45-year saber-rattling dangerous cold war period. "Free speech" is permitted in our universities for those who do not threaten the status quo of welfarism, globalism, corporatism, and a financial system that provides great benefits to powerful special interests. If a university professor does not follow the party line, he does not receive tenure.

We have been losing our freedoms in a gradual process until we now stand face to face with tyranny. Political correctness has no place in our country. Free people can discuss any topic they choose in any terms they choose. Pointing out facts should not condemn one to charges of racism or anti-Semitism. Is it anti-Semitic to point out that many of those pushing hardest for world government are rich Jews, or, that Israeli interests play an unwarranted role in our government?  

Is it racist to point out that over 90% of crimes committed by one race against another, are committed by blacks against whites?  Someone always points out that there are restrictions on freedom of speech and cites the example that you cannot yell fire in a crowded theater. You can if it is the truth. 

I am proud to be a southern white man. I am fed up with political correctness and double standards in the government, media and schools. It will not stop until we find the courage to make it stop. White people are an endangered species unless we cast off political correctness and begin to defend ourselves. Our ancestors created the American dream. We must preserve it.

I recently joined the NAAWP, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF WHITE PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET, and I do not give a rat's behind what anybody else thinks about that! "Equal rights for Whites - Special Privileges for None."  Does this mean that I hate my next door neighbors because they are black? No, I like them and enjoy the same relationship with them that I have always had with all my neighbors. We greet each other and engage in conversation as we come and go and try to lend a helping hand when needed. They are pleasant to talk with and have done nothing for me to complain about. Would I feel any differently about them if I found out they belong to the NAACP? No, of course not.

Let us assume that we do not know any chickens, and that exposed to the truth from someone we know we can trust we would all choose freedom over world government. I hope our family understands that my public appeals are motivated by pure love, and desperation. The enemy is working frantically  to gain control of the internet which I believe is indispensable in this struggle. We need every individual who is willing to live as equals under the law and to accept personal responsibility for their lives, to join in this effort. There are plenty of openings at the front. It is not necessary to sellout our birthright. Glory, fame, fortune and a place in history can await those who desire them, if we win. Those like me will be content with retaining our liberty.

We should begin by requiring our government to proclaim that the US will never agree to surrender sovereignty to a world government. Now I know this is a simplistic sounding suggestion but it or some similar proclamation needs to be issued. Every member, elected, appointed or hired should be required to endorse it. It is a simple statement that all who would be free should be comfortable endorsing. Why would anyone object to it if there is nothing to hide? This could be a rallying point and a first step toward electing a Congress of normal everyday citizens to restore some sanity and common sense into the governing process. Let's secure the republic. We can hash out our differences on lesser issues later.

There are official ways to change the Constitution. It is a difficult process for a reason. We cannot continue to allow it to be ignored for if it is to mean anything, it has to mean everything. Every graduating class dumps a new crop of brain washed voters willing to accept their invisible chains. We need to stop the one sided propaganda in the schools and the media. It can only happen with a grassroots campaign of regular people. We have to ignore the labels, black, white, republicans, democrats, liberals, conservatives etc., and think bigger than that.

More Americans than ever before are very much aware of what's going on in Washington and how, on a daily basis, their liberties are being undermined. The majority of Americans know government programs fail to achieve their goals and waste huge sums of money. A smoldering resentment against the unfairness of government efforts to force equality on us can inspire violence, but instead it should be used to encourage an honest system of equal justice based on individual not collective rights. We face tough odds, but to avoid battle or believe there is a place to escape to someplace else in the world would concede victory to those who endorse authoritarian government. The grand experiment in human liberty must not be abandoned. A renewed hope and understanding of liberty pursued by eagles is what we need.

I love you grandson.

Poppa